Skip to main content
Policy & Ethics

"An AI did it" is no defense, says nonprofit suing OpenAI over Hugging Face hack

OpenAI's hack of Hugging Face in July 2026 has spurred a lawsuit demanding that the company stop accessing third-party computer systems and halt AI…

By Precis Daily Newsroom1 min read187 words
Illustration for: "An AI did it" is no defense, says nonprofit suing OpenAI ov
Illustration
Key points
  • OpenAI's hack of Hugging Face in July 2026 has spurred a lawsuit demanding that the company stop accessing third-party computer systems and halt AI development practices that can harm the public.
  • California law makes it clear that it is not a defense 'that the artificial intelligence autonomously caused the harm,'" the group said.
  • The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco County Superior Court, said OpenAI also violated California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL).

OpenAI's hack of Hugging Face in July 2026 has spurred a lawsuit demanding that the company stop accessing third-party computer systems and halt AI development practices that can harm the public. The lawsuit was filed by Legal Advocates for Safe Science & Technology (LASST), which said yesterday that the hack in which OpenAI "agents stole credentials, uploaded malicious files, and gained control over key parts of Hugging Face’s internal systems... is unquestionably illegal under California law." California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act (CDAFA) prohibits unauthorized access into computer systems, "and it doesn’t matter that a swarm of AI agents carried out this cyberattack. California law makes it clear that it is not a defense 'that the artificial intelligence autonomously caused the harm,'" the group said. The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco County Superior Court, said OpenAI also violated California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL). "OpenAI’s insistence on externalizing the harms of its unsafe decision-making is a fundamentally unfair business practice," the complaint said, adding that "such risk-taking for private gain at substantial public expense is immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, and substantially injurious conduct."Read full article Comments

Sources

Summarized from the linked originals.

Related stories

Illustration for: A Flaw in ChatGPT’s Mac App Could Have Let Hackers Grab Sens
Products & Tools

Hardly a day goes by lately without news of AI agents autonomously hacking websites or AI tools being used by cybercriminals and scammers . But a recently patched vulnerability in the macOS version of OpenAI’s ChatGPT underscores the potential value to attackers of compromising AI software itself as these apps proliferate more and more.

WIRED AI3 min
Illustration for: Amazon shuts out Meta's Muse
Guides

PLUS: How to set up ChatGPT to write in your voice Good morning, AI enthusiasts, and welcome to our 4,369 new readers. Meta’s Muse AI assistant climbed to the top of the U.S.

The Rundown AI7 min