Skip to main content
Open Source

My Workflow for Understanding LLM Architectures

Many people asked me over the past months to share my workflow for how I come up with the LLM architecture sketches and drawings in my articles, talks, and…

By Precis Daily Newsroom1 min read245 words
Illustration for: My Workflow for Understanding LLM Architectures
Illustration
Key points
  • Many people asked me over the past months to share my workflow for how I come up with the LLM architecture sketches and drawings in my articles, talks, and the LLM-Gallery.
  • It doesn’t really apply to models like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, where the weights and details are proprietary.Also, this is intentionally a fairly manual process.
  • But if the goal is to learn how these architectures work, then doing a few of these by hand is, in my opinion, still one of the best exercises.Figure 2: At a high level, the workflow goes from config files and code to architecture insights.

Many people asked me over the past months to share my workflow for how I come up with the LLM architecture sketches and drawings in my articles, talks, and the LLM-Gallery. So I thought it would be useful to document the process I usually follow.The short version is that I usually start with the official technical reports, but these days, papers are often less detailed than they used to be, especially for most open-weight models from industry labs.The good part is that if the weights are shared on the Hugging Face Model Hub and the model is supported in the Python transformers library, we can usually inspect the config file and the reference implementation directly to get more information about the architecture details. And “working” code doesn’t lie.Figure 1: The basic motivation for this workflow is that papers are often less detailed these days, but a working reference implementation gives us something concrete to inspect.I should also say that this is mainly a workflow for open-weight models. It doesn’t really apply to models like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, where the weights and details are proprietary.Also, this is intentionally a fairly manual process. You could automate parts of it. But if the goal is to learn how these architectures work, then doing a few of these by hand is, in my opinion, still one of the best exercises.Figure 2: At a high level, the workflow goes from config files and code to architecture insights.

Sources

Summarized from the linked originals.

Related stories

Illustration for: The Agent Said It Was Done. The Database Disagreed.
Open Source

The Agent Said It Was Done. The Database Disagreed. The Agent Said It Was Done. The Database Disagreed. Microsoft ThinkingBox grades AI agents on the records they leave behind, not the sentences they generate, and then asks whether they can do it twenty times in a row.

Hugging Face Blog13 min